Under the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights companies have a responsibility to undertake human rights due diligence. However, almost half (46.2%) of the biggest companies in the world evaluated by the Corporate Human Rights Benchmark in 2020 failed to show any evidence of identifying or mitigating human rights issues in their supply chains.
There is more and more understanding that the smart mix prescribed by the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights means that there needs to be legislation in order to reach the stated aims.Heidi Hautala, Vice-President of European Parliament
There is growing momentum worldwide among governments to require companies to undertake human rights due diligence from the French Duty of Vigilance Law to child labour due diligence legislation in the Netherlands. Civil society across the world is seizing the opportunity for more robust requirements on companies. Major investors and companies are also speaking out in favour of such legislation.
This portal collects the latest news on mandatory human rights due diligence, national and regional developments, public company statements in support of mandatory human rights due diligence, guidance for governments, and examples of company implementation of human rights due diligence. It also hosts a blog series where experts from civil society, governments and business discuss what mandatory human rights due diligence could mean for advancing human rights in business.
Towards EU Mandatory Due Diligence Legislation: Perspectives from Business, Public Sector, Academia and Civil Society
Voices from around the globe explore what meaningful EU mandatory due diligence and corporate accountability legislation should look like, in this Resource Centre collation of perspectives.
2020 Corporate Human Rights Benchmark on human rights disclosures of 230 companies across 5 sectors
Due diligence remains one of the weakest areas, with nearly half of companies failing on every indicator - we need mandatory laws to eradicate abuse
The concept of a “safe harbour” and mandatory human rights due diligence
As part of the discussions around mHREDD, the concept of a “safe harbour” against liability has surfaced in various contexts. In this paper, Lise Smit and Claire Bright consider what is meant by a “safe harbour” in this context, and how this concept interacts with the concept of mHREDD.
Companies and investors in support of mandatory human rights due diligence
Businesses, associations and investors with statements in support of human rights due diligence legislation
Latest on the Proposed Binding Treaty on business and human rights
Find out more about the steps to elaborate an international legally binding instrument to regulate the activities of businesses.
Latest on UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights
More about the UNGPs
Our responsibility in a globalised world
German companies call for mandatory due diligence